In his blind egocentricity, Lear has broken the bonds of state, family and fri destinationship. By breaking these bonds, Lear transforms from a world powerful, item-by-item individual to a vulnerable, weak, desperate hu art objectity. Is this merely his fault? Although around would be quick to theorise yes, I would befuddle to say no. Lear was a victim. He was a victim due to his immense compassion and trust. Lear is the perfect recitation of the saying good guys manage in last. why should we blest the man for having a big inwardness? wherefore should we criticize him for pleasant and trusting his family? He deserves every(prenominal) of our sympathy and pity. in that respect atomic number 18 numerous suits why he deserves our pity, but a a couple of(prenominal) very watertight cases stand place.         The catalyst that sparks the beginning of the end for Lear is his altercation with Cordelia during the ceremony. He asks his 3 daughters to profe ss their make do to him. certain(a) this is sh every last(predicate) in all(prenominal)ow considering its through words, but every adept deserves to feel slamd, and Lear, set up the simple man that he is, is content with words as proof of adore. His 2 elderlyer daughters, Regan and G iodinril do a dotty job of appeasing him, delivering immaculate, embellished deliveryes that meet and exceed what his simple convey/write head would be satisfied with. Upon his most awe for Cordelias turn, all she back tooth say is nada. That rightfulness there is a harp because we all know she loves him to a greater extent than the other(a) dickens sisters. True she does not deprivation to lie to her founder and exposit him with false warmth, however nonehing is a lie. She definitely loves him. She and so goes on to claim to love him gibe to my bond. She is fundamentally saying she precisely loves him because he is her father. That is a blatant lie, and still though she is trying to defend him by saying this, sh! e truly crushes his heart. Who can blame Lear for the mien he reacted to this. How is one suppose to feel when ones most loved kidskin confesses that theyve only(prenominal) loved you according to family bond? It wasnt requisite for Cordelia to deliver an elaborate, fallacious speech like her sisters however she should confound come clean somewhat her love for him, because she did love him onlyheartedly. notwithstanding a simple, short exculpation of love would occupy do him happy. I loved her most, and pattern to set my rest on her kindly nursery. he says. By trying not to lie to him, she lied to him even worse, and that is why Lear cant be blamed for what he did as a result.         Lear holds a world of trust in his family. He loves them so deeply that he believes anything they say. Innocently, he bestows upon his three daughters all of his power only to be mercilessly backstabbed by his aver roots. He was so blind by his genuine love for his daug hters that he couldnt perhaps imagine their ulterior motives. What kind of a cold, selfish, diabolical father would think such things of his daughters? scorn how he may come across when he let outs, Lear is a softy deep down. At the whim of their rubbish words, Lear imparts his power to them. He trusts them with his life, for he go away have no power after giving it all up. Unfortunately, his daughters turned out to be demons. In the absence of their mother, he ran a whole empire to make life reform for his daughters. He risks everything on the strength of receiving love and care from his daughters. He doesnt care about the power; he gave it all up in a second. He only destinyed to be loved, and Goneril and Regan took advantage of this compassionate trait of his to steal his power.         In a direful attempt to get Lear to disclose things for what they unfeignedly are, Kent gets himself banished. Although his intentions are kind, Kent essential realize that Lear has just had his heart shattered. He is in ! pieces. When one is overcome by such elicit emotion, as is confirm by what Lear had to endure, then its unsufferable to think in a rational manner. Further more than, Kent doesnt reason with Lear in a careful way. When nearone has been so devastated, they must be dealt with delicately. Kent says, Be Kent bold when Lear is mad. What wouldst thou do, old man? By calling him mad, and old man, Kent further aggravates Lears emotion, adding angriness and frustration to his already weak state. This causes Lear to act even more irrational, and banishes Kent. If one just had their heart broken by the one they loved most in this world, the last thing they occupy is for psyche to step in and call them an idiot. As Lear shed it, Come not in the midst of the dragon and his wrath Kent should have approached Lear in a calmer, more soothing manner, perhaps asking him to step outside and speak privately. Instead Kent verbally embarrasses Lear in front of all the royalty, and adds insult to the injury. Kent brought his banishment upon himself.         Yes, Lear is the one who in the end breaks the bonds of state, friendship, and family. Was it his fault? No. Cordelia lied to him. She told him she had no love for him other than their family bond. Not only that, but she also says she would love some husband that she hasnt even met yet as such(prenominal) as she will love him. He loved her more than anything, and she took his heart and tore it into pieces without sentiment of the consequences. He loved and sure his two elder daughters, Goneril and Regan as well, handing them over two thirds of his empire, only to be deceived. Is it a disgust to love and trust someone so much that you drop sight of the truth? Its especially hard to see the truth when its something so horrid that its unthinkable. Kent fuelled the flames, and for it he was burned. As a loyal, long-time friend, he should have known how Lear would react, and should have taken wiser act ions. Kent acted rashly and inconsiderately towards L! ear, making a mockery of him in public. Lear had no natural selection but to alleviate face and whatever ounce of hauteur he had left field by banishing Kent although he surely didnt want to. Lear is a naïve man indeed, but all of his intentions were good. Who are we to blame him for loving his family and trusting them? Dont we all? How can we blame him for being naïve, its like blaming a rock for being dumb, thats just the way hes always been. In the end, Lear neglect victim because he was a kind, loving man, in a cruel, inconsiderate world. If you want to get a full essay, put up it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment