Thomas Paine and Common Sense :: Papers

doubting Thomas Paine and Common SenseIn early 1776 the design surrounding the idea of revolution was evenly change integrity in Britains colonies in America. The feelings were split evenly between those for a revolt, those opposing it and those who were neutral. In January 1776 Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense. The ideas and theories expressed in the pamphlet were very compelling and thorough. make enough to sway much of the undecided colonists to agree that revolt is the necessity course of action. Paine states in the introduction to Common Sense a foresighted habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at fist a formidable holler in defense of custom. This argument is not one of listing injustices or even reasons for revolt but it does provoke the reader to decide if his thoughts are genuine or from not thinking critic wholey about the multiplication and situations. Now that we my suffer ourselves to examine the co mponent parts of the English Constitution, the faults shall be found. Paine argues one theoretical position that could influence those loyal to the King himself. If the British constitution is a system of checks and balances and the commons are the check on the king then this infers, That the king is not to be trusted. This brings to light an rudimentary fault with the way the British system of government is arranged. Paine is against a divided form of government. He feels that simpler government is best. That way the people know whom to score responsible. He also feels the king did not get better with the cosmea of a chambered government only subtle. He later states that the system, hath all the distinctions of an house divided against itself. He then again makes the argument that the loyalists confine not opened their eyes to the faults of the British form of government. Paine says that those in regard of the current form of government feel that way more from topic pride than reason. Paine contends that there is no reason to feel loyalty to Britain. He feels that all the actions of Britain are in its self-interest. He feels the colonies would not need fend for if Britain would not bring its enemies to the colonies. There would not have been a French and Indian war because the colonies would not be enemies of the French.